From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Nov  8 21:03:03 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8449816A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  8 Nov 2004 21:03:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [168.103.84.182])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5C543D55
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  8 Nov 2004 21:03:03 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Received: from localhost (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by harmony.village.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id iA8Kxx04031222;
	Mon, 8 Nov 2004 14:00:00 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com)
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 14:00:25 -0700 (MST)
Message-Id: <20041108.140025.05468044.imp@bsdimp.com>
To: rodrigc@crodrigues.org
From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20041107034114.GA56337@crodrigues.org>
References: <20041106150625.GA84763@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
	<47528984.20041106165510@andric.com>
	<20041107034114.GA56337@crodrigues.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and onwards
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Nov 2004 21:03:03 -0000

In message: <20041107034114.GA56337@crodrigues.org>
            Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org> writes:
: RCS, then how about Bitkeeper?  It is quite popular

It's license is totally unacceptible for our needs.  It is worse than
commerical: it prohibits me from developing my own version control
system whether or not I actually use it to do so.

Warner