From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 14 18:50:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A249106566C for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:50:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrej@antiszoc.hu) Received: from mail.deployis.eu (mail.deployis.eu [217.20.135.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 814898FC18 for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:50:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=antiszoc.hu; s=default; h=Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=oIs2E8eNvZbDiRNbwoZe2nooagq4Rw0oYmvWs/dwN+g=; b=A9hTIlSA2yNiDM0/aM9K2gZrWZqhctY7b/bmJmfJuw3T7iNsLNDBdC0QgkI/Ie7siA0kOAG9KEPNVwW1kwgJN3gNmMGnUeOhSq4MJcbzai9Lt2nNlpx1/FBKZSW5qVN8; Authentication-Results: mail.deployis.eu dkim=none Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46232 helo=mail.deployis.eu) by mail.deployis.eu with esmtp (Exim 4.71 #1 (Debian)) id 1S7sh8-0006lC-21 from for ; Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:13:06 +0100 Received: from pool-232-213.ippark.hu ([31.223.232.213]) by mail.deployis.eu with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:13:06 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:13:06 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=B3t_Andr=C3=A1s?= To: In-Reply-To: <4F6061FF.2060106@FreeBSD.org> References: <4F605212.2020800@FreeBSD.org> <20120314095041.3ea64eb4@suse2.iptech.internal> <4F6061FF.2060106@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: andrej@antiszoc.hu User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.2.1 X-Mail-Status-postahivatal: trustedmail (from 127.0.0.1) X-Spam-Score-postahivatal: -43 Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: apache-2.4.X & php5-5.4.X X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2012 18:50:56 -0000 On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 10:16:47 +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: > Rainer Duffner wrote: >> For me, a much more important question is: is lang/php5 going to be >> updated to 5.4 (and thus 5.3 disappearing) or is there going to be >> yet >> another php-port (lang/php54)? > > php5 will be updated to 5.4. lang/php52 will continue to exist. 5.3 > will > disappear unless someone will do the same work done for 5.2. Hi, Personally I don't think simply jumping from 5.3 to 5.4 is a good idea. Many "legacy" features are wiped out, which simply won't followed that fast by customers and even common CMS-es. Andras