From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 26 04:58:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C787816A4CE for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:58:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937B943D3F for ; Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:58:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j0Q4wFQI019460; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:58:15 -0800 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id j0Q4wFqG019459; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:58:15 -0800 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 20:58:15 -0800 From: Brooks Davis To: "M. Warner Losh" Message-ID: <20050126045815.GC16997@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20050125173852.GU19973@silverwraith.com> <346a8022050125104667f631be@mail.gmail.com> <20050126022936.GI692@empiric.icir.org> <20050125.212014.51702751.imp@bsdimp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="69pVuxX8awAiJ7fD" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050125.212014.51702751.imp@bsdimp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: cokane@cokane.org cc: liukang@bjpu.edu.cn cc: delphij@delphij.net cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 04:58:15 -0000 --69pVuxX8awAiJ7fD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:20:14PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20050126022936.GI692@empiric.icir.org> > Bruce M Simpson writes: > : On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:46:30PM -0500, Coleman Kane wrote: > : > This is only my personal opinion. I think the WITH_XXXX_OVERWITE_BASE > : > make options help substantiate it, however. > :=20 > : I've recently updated the tcpdump port to fix a number of issues. If > : people could confirm that the OVERWRITE_BASE option still works there, > : I should be most grateful. >=20 > For something as simple and useful as nc, I'd rather see it in the > base system than as a port. It is useful enough to enough people that > the extra care and feeding it will get in the base is worth the extra > burdon it places on us to do that. It doesn't duplicate things in the > base system, and provides functionality that's useful to many people. netcat does something so simple (hook some file descriptors together until something closes them), it always suprises me to remember that there's no library function to do this. To me that argues for being in the base system. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --69pVuxX8awAiJ7fD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFB9yNmXY6L6fI4GtQRApIUAKCXEjMjWIltJaEDGFflzSNcESOKpgCgldrY M0z6ZFL+Jf8oQXFtQOeVEl8= =QD9a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --69pVuxX8awAiJ7fD--