From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 17:37:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8D111065673 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:37:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B51E8FC15 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 17:37:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.3/8.14.1) with ESMTP id o24HJoNA002881; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 10:19:50 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:20:07 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <20100304.102007.1151864885495261672.imp@bsdimp.com> To: ddkprog@yahoo.com From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <401095.35021.qm@web59107.mail.re1.yahoo.com> References: <401095.35021.qm@web59107.mail.re1.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 22.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: propose: all arch move into a separate dir X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 17:37:58 -0000 In message: <401095.35021.qm@web59107.mail.re1.yahoo.com> paradox writes: : iam propose all the architecture move in a separate directory : as is done in openbsd and netbsd : : ie : #mkdir /usr/src/sys/arch : #mv -R /usr/src/sys/{amd64,arm,i386,ia64,mips,pc98,powerpc,sparc64,sun4v,xen,x86) /usr/src/sys/arch/ : : Would it ever done in freebsd? No. That ship sailed in 1995. Besides, it would be the mother of all bikesheds. Do we want to have a sys/cpu/{mips,x86,arm,etc} for CPU support and a sys/arch/$MACHINE for support for machines that use that, how does that interact with source doe that assumes certain things in machine/foo.h. Or do we want to have better organized sub-ports. Do we want to reorg config while we're at it, and what about modules. And sys/dev is too crowded, let's fix that too while we're at it. The end result: gridlock and nothing will happen. Warner