From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 3 04:47:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87444426; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 04:47:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0206.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.206]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26AB029C7; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 04:47:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BY2PR05CA039.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.250.29) by BY2PR05MB111.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.38.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.949.11; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 04:47:18 +0000 Received: from BN1BFFO11FD009.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c10::1:190) by BY2PR05CA039.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:2c5f::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.949.11 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 04:47:18 +0000 Received: from P-EMF03-SAC.jnpr.net (66.129.239.17) by BN1BFFO11FD009.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.58.144.72) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.949.9 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 3 Jun 2014 04:47:18 +0000 Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMF03-SAC.jnpr.net (172.24.192.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:46:53 -0700 Received: from chaos.jnpr.net (chaos.jnpr.net [172.24.29.229]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id s534kcn27154; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:46:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sjg@juniper.net) Received: from chaos.jnpr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chaos.jnpr.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81DF6580A1; Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:46:38 -0700 (PDT) To: Bryan Drewery Subject: Re: svn commit: r266760 - head/contrib/bmake In-Reply-To: <538D1DB7.7010508@FreeBSD.org> References: <201405271839.s4RIdDq8055387@svn.freebsd.org> <538D1DB7.7010508@FreeBSD.org> Comments: In-reply-to: Bryan Drewery message dated "Mon, 02 Jun 2014 19:58:31 -0500." From: "Simon J. Gerraty" X-Mailer: MH-E 7.82+cvs; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 22.3.1 Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 21:46:38 -0700 Message-ID: <20140603044638.81DF6580A1@chaos.jnpr.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.239.17; CTRY:US; IPV:NLI; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(377424004)(199002)(189002)(97736001)(81542001)(81342001)(87286001)(104166001)(99396002)(88136002)(46102001)(81156002)(93916002)(86362001)(87936001)(62966002)(92566001)(92726001)(102836001)(33656002)(102176002)(44976005)(83322001)(53416003)(6806004)(76176999)(77096999)(50986999)(93546004)(77982001)(64706001)(4396001)(50226001)(74662001)(76482001)(74502001)(79102001)(31966008)(47776003)(20776003)(21056001)(77156001)(84676001)(48376002)(89996001)(69596002)(68736004)(80022001)(83072002)(90896003)(85852003)(50466002)(42262001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB111; H:P-EMF03-SAC.jnpr.net; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BL:0; ACTION:Default; RISK:Low; SCL:0; SPMLVL:NotSpam; PCL:0; RULEID: X-Forefront-PRVS: 02318D10FB Received-SPF: SoftFail (: domain of transitioning juniper.net discourages use of 66.129.239.17 as permitted sender) Authentication-Results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 66.129.239.17) smtp.mailfrom=sjg@juniper.net; X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2014 04:47:29 -0000 On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 19:58:31 -0500, Bryan Drewery writes: >Not sure if anyone cares, but this change breaks all ports tree >checkouts from before 2014-05-05 on src head with this revision. Yes, an older ports tree would need an older bmake (or fmake). Are we saying ports is *not* ready for that hack to be removed?