From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 24 13:33:47 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B16AB; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@smeets.im) Received: from mail.solomo.de (mail.solomo.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1142::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CFE38FC14; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cpos1.nexxtmobile.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.solomo.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0B49DFC6; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:33:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at nexxtmobile.de Received: from mail.solomo.de ([127.0.0.1]) by cpos1.nexxtmobile.de (cpos1.nexxtmobile.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QjP83RzeA_9I; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:33:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bender.solomo.local (b2b-92-50-66-163.unitymedia.biz [92.50.66.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.solomo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B3E0DFAC; Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:33:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5087EE34.3030108@smeets.im> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:33:40 +0200 From: Florian Smeets User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121012 Thunderbird/16.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dominic Fandrey Subject: Re: [CFT] fusefs-ntfs and fusefs-libs updates References: <5040DB95.30700@smeets.im> <5084FE61.7030805@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: <5084FE61.7030805@bsdforen.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" , bdrewery@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 13:33:47 -0000 On 10/22/2012 10:05, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On my RELENG_9 system apart from ntfs non of the fusefs systems works > any more: > > fusefs-smbnetfs-0.5.3a > fusefs-sshfs-2.4 > fusefs-wdfs-1.4.2_4 > > And concerning ntfs, ports/170695 is still present. > > All in all, I was much better off before the updates. > Yes, I'm aware of the problems. We are working on making the fuse import from head work on older releases and update the fusefs-kmod with that. Also we are currently looking into the problem why certain fusefs filesystems don't work with the current versions in ports. Florian