From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Oct 7 15:52:13 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA13823 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:52:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA13817 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:52:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca3-63.ix.netcom.com [209.109.233.63]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA19472; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id PAA11465; Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 15:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199810072252.PAA11465@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> To: n@nectar.com CC: ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: (message from Jacques Vidrine on Wed, 07 Oct 1998 17:41:47 -0500) Subject: Re: What's the right way to handle old bsd.port.mk? From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * OK, one more thing. As far as I know, updating bsd.port.mk * will require end users to do one of the following: * * * cvsup and install bsd.port.mk from src/share/mk * * use cvsweb.cgi to download the correct revision of bsd.port.mk * * grab either * ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-stable/src/share/mk/bsd.port.mk OR * ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-current/src/share/mk/bsd.port.mk * depending * * Seems like the latter is probably easiest for most users. Can you * think of any snafus or better alternatives before I write something * up saying ``do this to stay in sync with the ports collection''? That sounds fine, but for -stable, they may need more than just bsd.port.mk (especially if they are using something older than 2.2.7R). There's an "minimal upgrade kit" linked from the www.freebsd.org/ports page. The biggest problem here is that people are installing 2.2.7R and thinking they can immediately use the latest ports-current (because that is the latest release). We need to find why they are thinking that way and fix it. Right now -current and 3.0-snap users are not much of a problem because they generally know what it takes to track -current, but with 3.0R coming up, we should make sure those users won't get the same bad idea. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message