From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 13 22:34:24 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05AA16A469; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:34:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from null@barea.org) Received: from mx1.vmstat.org (206-248-171-233.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.171.233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2FA13C46B; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:34:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from null@barea.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.vmstat.org) by mx1.vmstat.org with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IKi9D-0002lw-V7; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:12:28 -0400 Received: from 206.248.190.92 (SquirrelMail authenticated user alec) by mail.vmstat.org with HTTP; Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:12:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3500.206.248.190.92.1187043147.squirrel@mail.vmstat.org> In-Reply-To: <873ayorlo1.fsf@thingy.datadok.no> References: <3962.206.248.190.92.1186944927.squirrel@mail.vmstat.org> <46BF6809.2000406@FreeBSD.org> <1270.206.248.190.92.1186953629.squirrel@mail.vmstat.org> <224945138.20070813003105@rulez.sk> <873ayorlo1.fsf@thingy.datadok.no> Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 18:12:27 -0400 (EDT) From: "Alec Bogus Email" To: "Peter N. M. Hansteen" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.9a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: email address on http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/archive X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 22:34:24 -0000 Thanks for the help guys. Greylisting is definitly something i've been looking at (for years actually), but i've been too lazy to implement. But now, my lameness is gonna be kicking my ass with more and more spam so that's a bad for a good, i guess... Alec Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote: > Daniel Gerzo writes: > >> Actually, there is almost nothing you can do about it. I would >> recommed you to install and properly configure spam filters and >> maybe to implement graylisting if you have problems with spam. > > In my book, greylisting is not a maybe if you want a sane mail > environment. Unfortunately there's a lot of uninformed comment > floating around, the fact is that the few wrinkles that need to be > worked around (large outgoing server farms, incompetently run mail > services) are easy to work around, and it ends up saving you time and > power. > > - P > -- > Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC 1149 implementation team > http://bsdly.blogspot.com/ http://www.datadok.no/ http://www.nuug.no/ > "Remember to set the evil bit on all malicious network traffic" > delilah spamd[29949]: 85.152.224.147: disconnected after 42673 seconds. >