From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 29 21:56:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEF2106567B for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (rachie.is-a-geek.net [66.230.99.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B858FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:56:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mel.flynn+fbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net) Received: from smoochies.rachie.is-a-geek.net (mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net [192.168.2.11]) by mailhub.rachie.is-a-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79F8F7E818; Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:56:40 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mel Flynn To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:56:39 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (FreeBSD/8.0-BETA2; KDE/4.2.4; i386; ; ) References: <3cb459ed0906290644x86ac44cu48fd8bba52d024f9@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3cb459ed0906290644x86ac44cu48fd8bba52d024f9@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907291356.39608.mel.flynn+fbsd.ports@mailing.thruhere.net> Cc: Alexander Churanov , Volker Stolz Subject: Re: devel/boost: new patch for testing update to 1.39 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:56:42 -0000 On Monday 29 June 2009 05:44:20 Alexander Churanov wrote: > I've made several changes to new set of boost ports. Please, review > them and test new set of ports, if possible. I guess I should've tested these, but I didn't expect it to replace a minor CONFLICTS problem that I had locally patched with a few lines, with a major not optional dependency on a retired compiler. Is pyste going to be optional in a new revision or is there any chance gccxml can be patched so it builds cleanly with the current GCC? If the Makefile comment is the only problem, surely it can be addressed? # GCC-XML has some constructs that GCC 4.2 does not like. Namely, # the use of casted-pointer-dereferences as an lvalue to post-increment # operations. Additionally the gccxml port seems pretty much dead. An attempt of revival has been done in 2007, but no release has ever been made. -- Mel