From owner-freebsd-current Sat Feb 10 16:53:08 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id QAA25676 for current-outgoing; Sat, 10 Feb 1996 16:53:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA25622 Sat, 10 Feb 1996 16:52:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id BAA23457 ; Sun, 11 Feb 1996 01:52:41 +0100 Received: from (uucp@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with UUCP id BAA11135 ; Sun, 11 Feb 1996 01:52:42 +0100 Received: (from roberto@localhost) by keltia.freenix.fr (8.7.3/keltia-uucp-2.7) id BAA03743; Sun, 11 Feb 1996 01:21:59 +0100 (MET) From: Ollivier Robert Message-Id: <199602110021.BAA03743@keltia.freenix.fr> Subject: Re: Kerberos @ freebsd.org? To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 01:21:59 +0100 (MET) Cc: mark@grondar.za, dima@FreeBSD.org, ache@astral.msk.su, current@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199602101759.KAA00992@rover.village.org> from Warner Losh at "Feb 10, 96 10:59:15 am" X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT ctm#1630 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL5 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk It seems that Warner Losh said: > I have heard that different kerberoses use different port numbers and > that the encryption isn't completely standardized. The problem I have with Kerberos is that it does not -- to my knowledge -- encrypt everything from a telnet session. So trafic from any X11 program you start on the other side will not be encrypted. SSH does it _automatically_. When you think about it, if you were looking for a reason to use it over Kerberos, you just got it. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #5: Sun Feb 4 03:11:17 MET 1996