From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 19 05:36:46 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B45B16A4CE; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 05:36:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3F943D49; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 05:36:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) j2J5bPvJ024407; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:37:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <423B9EE4.1090706@FreeBSD.org> References: <20050319030449.GG4271@freebsdmall.com> <423B9EE4.1090706@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-b9mItwQZuzj94v9lihz7" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:36:28 -0500 Message-Id: <1111210588.41721.42.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: gnome@freebsd.org cc: Murray Stokely Subject: Re: fam X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 05:36:46 -0000 --=-b9mItwQZuzj94v9lihz7 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 22:39 -0500, Adam Weinberger wrote: > Murray Stokely wrote: > > How important is fam to GNOME. Should we add a commented out entry to > > inetd.conf? Any comment on PR: conf/74004? > >=20 > > - Murray >=20 > What I'd like to see more than anything is a set of step-by-step=20 > instructions for getting fam up and running. I tried at one point, and=20 > couldn't get it to work right. If there were a handbook entry that gave=20 > step-by-step instructions, or a more complete pkg-message in the fam=20 > port itself, I wouldn't think that an inetd.conf entry is even necessary. FAM is pretty easy to deploy these days. All that's needed is the inetd.conf entry, then killall -HUP inetd. I really think we should consider teaching fam to do its own activation. We could make it an optional knob in the Makefile. Joe >=20 > # Adam >=20 >=20 --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-b9mItwQZuzj94v9lihz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCO7pcb2iPiv4Uz4cRApHVAJ0QfNuxSCl87bQF+j6iiP+oCjlDQgCgp48F ZYgbPJGp6Tk8yuDNt8sqSac= =l+lx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-b9mItwQZuzj94v9lihz7--