Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 20:58:21 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> To: Ronald G Minnich <rminnich@lanl.gov> Cc: "freebsd-cluster@freebsd.org" <freebsd-cluster@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Is this list active? Message-ID: <20000822205820.K14958@daemon.ninth-circle.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0008180823480.22846-100000@mini.acl.lanl.gov>; from rminnich@lanl.gov on Fri, Aug 18, 2000 at 08:25:37AM -0600 References: <20000818104056.A84928@lucifer.bart.nl> <Pine.LNX.4.20.0008180823480.22846-100000@mini.acl.lanl.gov>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000818 18:01], Ronald G Minnich (rminnich@lanl.gov) wrote: >On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: > >> Just a curious question, I guess a keep alive type of system where a >> daemon per host sends out and acks keep alive messages is the easiest >> form of high availability, right? > >not so clear that it is useful, but it will work. We need to start somewhere. ;) And a keep-alive type of signaller daemon is the easiest to program and thus a good starting point. At least for me. -- Jeroen Ruigrok vd Werven/Asmodai asmodai@[wxs.nl|bart.nl|freebsd.org] Documentation nutter/C-rated Coder BSD: Technical excellence at its best The BSD Programmer's Documentation Project <http://home.wxs.nl/~asmodai>; Abandon hope, all ye who enter here... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-cluster" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000822205820.K14958>