From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 19 08:22:27 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBCF16A4CE; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:22:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 62-15-215-140.inversas.jazztel.es (62-15-215-140.inversas.jazztel.es [62.15.215.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F1D43D1D; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:22:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es) Received: from redesjm.local (orion.redesjm.local [192.168.254.16]) j2J8MTTx004857; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:22:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@redesjm.local) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by redesjm.local (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id j2J8Mh0a000811; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:22:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@redesjm.local) From: Jose M Rodriguez To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 09:22:42 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050319030449.GG4271@freebsdmall.com> <1111210527.41721.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> In-Reply-To: <1111210527.41721.40.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503190922.43241.freebsd@redesjm.local> X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir Milter (version: 1.1.0-3; AVE: 6.30.0.7; VDF: 6.30.0.31; host: antares.redesjm.local) cc: gnome@freebsd.org cc: Murray Stokely Subject: Re: fam X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:22:28 -0000 El S=E1bado, 19 de Marzo de 2005 06:35, Joe Marcus Clarke escribi=F3: > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 19:04 -0800, Murray Stokely wrote: > > How important is fam to GNOME. Should we add a commented out entry > > to inetd.conf? Any comment on PR: conf/74004? > > I'll say it's critical to a user-friendly GNOME installation.=20 > Without FAM, you will need to restart gnome-panel each time you > install new software, the GTK+ file chooser doesn't update > dynamically nor does Nautilus (or anything related to the file > system). I can't imagine actually using a GNOME installation without > FAM. > > I think a commented out entry in /etc/inetd.conf would be good. I > think teaching the devel/fam port to create an active entry in > inetd.conf to be better. > If this is desired, an /etc/rc.d/famd would be better. famd can be work=20 in daemon mode without the aids of inetd. And, if we import the new famd from sgi (2.7.0) and the netbsd imon=20 (kqueue based), we can get a great improvement. I've this running at=20 work with freebsd4 and pkgsrc. =2D- josemi=20 > Joe > > > - Murray > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"