From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 5 04:08:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E3116A4CF for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 04:08:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 306E243D31 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 2004 04:08:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from donaldj1066@fastmail.fm) Received: from unknown (HELO pres7000.mylan.net) (donaldj@ameritech.net@68.249.3.95 with plain) by smtp810.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Sep 2004 04:08:12 -0000 From: "Donald J. O'Neill" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 23:07:19 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20040905001002.F3969637D@makeworld.com> In-Reply-To: <20040905001002.F3969637D@makeworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409042307.19717.donaldj1066@fastmail.fm> Subject: Re: Failure in portsdd -Uu... X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Sep 2004 04:08:13 -0000 Hi - Removing portmanager and portsman took care of the problem on my 5.2.1 system. Ruby no longer seg faults here. I don't know if portsdb -Uu works though. I use make index and portversion. Don Donald J. O'Neill donaldj1066@fastmail.fm <<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday 04 September 2004 07:10 pm, Chris wrote: > Your not the only one. Seems shit is really hitting the fan. > Stuff seems to be breaking left and right in the last week. > > I have no clue as to what's going on w/FBSD - but it's like the > folks doing quality and control are asleep at the wheel. > > If this is a known issue from before (as a thread eludes to) then > for hell's sakes, why hasn't this been addressed. > > To the folks trying to hash out 5.3 - relax. Let it go. There > seem to be too many other things in the mix that need a fixing - > this is starting to look like a Windows-like role-out. > > Fix the known issues, then progress. > > Just my 3.5 cents worth cuz I am so pissed at the breakage of my > 5.2.1 (that has been working for months, until the last 10 to 14 > days) --