From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Dec 27 22:43:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02736A5390C for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:43:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben.lavery@hashbang0.com) Received: from senderalt163-mail.zoho.com (senderalt163-mail.zoho.com [165.254.167.163]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD8681145 for ; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ben.lavery@hashbang0.com) Received: from talantinc.lan (3.154.198.146.dyn.plus.net [146.198.154.3]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTPS id 1451256174138967.8440701346641; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 14:42:54 -0800 (PST) From: Ben Lavery Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: VirtualBox paravirtualisation for FreeBSD guest? Message-Id: Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:42:50 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2015 22:43:07 -0000 Hullo all, I've got a Mac Pro I use for streaming media to an AppleTV and want to = run a FreeBSD VM on the spare resources. I'm planning on using = VirtualBox and have seen in more recent versions that it offers various = paravirtualisation interfaces = (https://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch10.html#gimproviders). Setting up = a new VirtualBox VM for various Linux distros seems to select different = paravirtualisation interfaces, but nothing but Default for FreeBSD. To install and use FreeBSD 10.2 in VirtualBox 5, am I best off to stick = with the defaults, or can I gain better performance/support by choosing = a certain paravirtualisation interface? And if so which one? I know = that GENERIC has Hyper-V support, so I=E2=80=99m wondering if that would = be a sensible option=E2=80=A6 Many thanks, Ben=