From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 19 19:02:25 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4509716A4CE; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:02:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [216.201.118.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E79FD43D3F; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:02:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430C460E8; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:02:24 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 05671-02; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:02:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from [216.201.118.138] (racerx.makeworld.com [216.201.118.138]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A6860E3; Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:02:21 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <423C7741.7090408@makeworld.com> Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 13:02:25 -0600 From: Chris User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050313) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Weinberger References: <423C7585.9090702@makeworld.com> <423C769E.3060209@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <423C769E.3060209@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic cc: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Making the panel transparent in 2.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: racerx@makeworld.com List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:02:25 -0000 Adam Weinberger wrote: > Chris wrote: > >> Is this possible? I mean, the whole panel in Gnome 2.10? >> >> > > Explain a bit more plz. Do you mean that you want all the applets > transparent as well? > > You know, the best way to get a completely transparent panel is to > delete it. > > # Adam > > While it's true that would be one way to do it, but I sorta like the panel up there. In answer to your question, yes - the whole thing. As it is, you can set the transpearancy, but it does not do the complete panel. Only parts of it. IE: Where it's labeled Applications Places Desktop -- Best regards, Chris If muprhy's law can go wrong, it will.