From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 20 21:25:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C471116A41F for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:25:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from leguin.anholt.net (69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com [69.30.77.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71FE243D80 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:25:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from leguin.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id jBKLP2L5025372 for ; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:25:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: (from anholt@localhost) by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id jBKLP1Ub025371 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:25:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: leguin.anholt.net: anholt set sender to eta@lclark.edu using -f From: Eric Anholt To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200512200943.jBK9hZEK081362@lurza.secnetix.de> References: <200512200943.jBK9hZEK081362@lurza.secnetix.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-QboYOkuKNCPBydB8HPS7" Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 13:25:01 -0800 Message-Id: <1135113901.75547.43.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: Re: DRM update for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 21:25:14 -0000 --=-QboYOkuKNCPBydB8HPS7 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2005-12-20 at 10:43 +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Eric Anholt wrote: > > Oliver Fromme wrote: > > > Freddie Cash wrote: > > > > Running glxgears at 1024x768x16 gives me a decent 35 fps, compared > > > > to the 1 fps I used to get. :) > > > =20 > > > Uhm. Are you sure that you're running hardware-accelerated > > > OpenGL glxgears? > > > =20 > > > I get 48 fps at 1400x1050x32 -- in software, without any > > > hardware 3D acceleration. (It's a 1.6GHz Centrino notebook > > > with shared i915 graphics. 2D acceleration is enabled, of > > > course.) > >=20 > > glxgears is not a benchmark. >=20 > That's right. I was not suggesting to use it as a real- > world benchmark, but rather as a rough indication whether > hardware acceleration is enabled at all or not. >=20 > If someone gets 1 fps (!) out of glxgears, something > is _seriously_ wrong, even with software rendering. No, that's what I'm trying to say here. There's nothing seriously wrong with 1 fps software glxgears at full screen, or anything wrong at all. I get about 9 fps at 1600x1200x16 on my amd64. 1 fps is totally believable on a different graphics card and a slower cpu. --=20 Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org --=-QboYOkuKNCPBydB8HPS7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDqHatHUdvYGzw6vcRAv/7AJ4weQyoVt0FkmNO3tlhqiqD23+ZzACcCnCR /RU9OasyQNHywKTetRV5W9w= =zB9z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-QboYOkuKNCPBydB8HPS7--