From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 11 16:38:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F23A106566C; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cracauer@koef.zs64.net) Received: from koef.zs64.net (koef.zs64.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:105e::1e6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75D98FC0A; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from koef.zs64.net (koef.zs64.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:105e::1e6]) by koef.zs64.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q1BGc7R5080395; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:38:07 GMT (envelope-from cracauer@koef.zs64.net) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by koef.zs64.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q1BGc77j080394; Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:38:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cracauer) Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 11:38:07 -0500 From: Martin Cracauer To: Bruce Evans Message-ID: <20120211163807.GA25525@cons.org> References: <201202102216.q1AMGI0m098192@svn.freebsd.org> <20120211194854.J2214@besplex.bde.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120211194854.J2214@besplex.bde.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG, Martin Cracauer , svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: svn commit: r231449 - head/usr.bin/tee X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:38:13 -0000 I (kinda) knew I shouldn't have tried to do this real quick before leaving for a trip. I reverted the change and I'll fix the concerns including the commit message when I'm back in a week. Now I also want to know what exactly is going on in bash there, the difference between the explicit named pipe and bash'es construct is unexplained. Bruce, do you have a rule of thumb concerning reacting to EAGAIN with select/poll or with a busy loop, or with one try instantly and then going with select? Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer/