From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 27 05:10:18 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41158371;
 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 05:10:18 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from vitja.makarov@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vb0-x22f.google.com (mail-vb0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF34D2AFD;
 Tue, 27 Aug 2013 05:10:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id h10so2712870vbh.34
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 22:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=TkmbD9KWNuKjO6DVtlPMl7QPVGf5N3MWVpLZk0vV4Vc=;
 b=NFTtskuLmn/bHpNmg6XKzSRJiGGQXAC2CFXQyxEuIIINR5oYweI4lGawyuq18ED9dd
 MTcZYOCd7nUiKyw5HgY+Me7UNFbXPhazKcT2XdT+0w+jtCrUmqwp3FgHXs9LnJyjL+oj
 0YRgS+Wf86FAAnIQ72ZXG3LTHA6LkGn9x68UhbEdTiR0EcThnLmEr6rEIahj+HCSeZIs
 7mN4nLc53vm1ii1/B/UmHkUk9YKNMGNdVdL0vltilBqevS5kA7Znahv22qs1BNHFczED
 grV5nB6SJGX63LsIqKUvACQTmVsJgfl2IkWZKNFTtg66VC3pyKSIAa82N+V+3OoH2O2m
 HBuA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.220.186.202 with SMTP id ct10mr18648408vcb.14.1377580216889; 
 Mon, 26 Aug 2013 22:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.52.27.51 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 22:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CACYV=-EvY4ftxkqCVZDfOW5VW1EA+a+v5twjuGSq+QxVWwEJSQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKGHGPS=HCYfXxPXuUz5G83j5sGieejPU-QHmi9TrmMhmweHLw@mail.gmail.com>
 <201308221408.08203.jhb@freebsd.org>
 <CAKGHGPSYxmVoet8TnbxVFeEVk9CeD5iF6DK2do3w_ScnPU_SpQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <201308230945.28701.jhb@freebsd.org>
 <CACYV=-FKAn3Mot2F+ko+NRfLiRC0ZCJcFc5W+FwOghngJY88EA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKGHGPRYyRje2hiq8bW2+i81tHLrFsSw-KYs+BHjcr_o0k4qow@mail.gmail.com>
 <CACYV=-EvY4ftxkqCVZDfOW5VW1EA+a+v5twjuGSq+QxVWwEJSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 09:10:16 +0400
Message-ID: <CAKGHGPSGRcorHjUMHC_JvcSaFtS=LcSVLZVK624FDUor0FkPmA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Question about socket timeouts
From: Vitja Makarov <vitja.makarov@gmail.com>
To: Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 11:24:48 +0000
Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 05:10:18 -0000

2013/8/26 Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>:
> Please consider the following patch:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~davide/review/socket_timeout.diff
> I've tested it and it works OK. I got a timeout which is ~= 25ms using
> the testcase provided by the user.
> The only doubt I have is about the range check, I've changed a bit
> because the 'integer' part of sbintime_t fits in 32-bits, but I'm not
> sure it's the best way of doing this.

Nice, that worked for me! I got ~26ms timeouts in average on my VM.

> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Vitja Makarov <vitja.makarov@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 2013/8/23 Davide Italiano <davide@freebsd.org>:
>>
>> I think that for socket's timeouts it's ok to have a HZ-precision. It
>> would be much more important to implement high-precision timeouts for
>> select() and friends, if it's not done yet (sorry I'm running 9.1).
>>
>
> JFYI, select()/usleep()/etc... are all fine grained right now in HEAD.
>

That's cool! Does that mean that FreeBSD 10 would be a tickless system?

-- 
vitja.