From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 28 13:17:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8267F16A403; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:17:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg) Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CC713C46F; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:17:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg) Received: from qlovarnika.bg.datamax (qlovarnika.bg.datamax [192.168.10.2]) by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B047B84E; Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:17:20 +0200 (EET) Received: (nullmailer pid 9293 invoked by uid 1002); Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:17:20 -0000 Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 15:17:20 +0200 From: Vasil Dimov To: Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu Message-ID: <20061228131720.GA9051@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> References: <4593AB3D.5090107@is-root.com> <20061228122828.GA8473@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20061228123616.GA8652@qlovarnika.bg.datamax> <20061228145728.4f13fa4a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20061228145728.4f13fa4a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to construct this port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vd@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:17:21 -0000 --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 28, 2006 at 02:57:28PM +0200, Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu wrote: > On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 14:36:16 +0200 > Vasil Dimov wrote: >=20 > > Interesting: > >=20 > > : host > > mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117] said: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; > > Client host [82.103.104.21] blocked using bg.countries.nerd.dk; Your > > IP is in bg, rejected based on geographical location (in reply to > > RCPT TO command) > >=20 > > Do you really block all mails coming from Bulgaria? >=20 > Romania also. >=20 > Dec 28 14:48:57 it postfix/smtp[42226]: 05C3A1711B: to=3D, relay=3Dmail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117]:25, delay=3D14, d= elays=3D0.2/0.15/2.6/11, dsn=3D5.7.1, sta > tus=3Dbounced (host mail.is-root.com[195.64.89.117] said: 554 5.7.1 Servi= ce unavailable; Client host [81.196.204.98] blocked using ro.countries.nerd= =2Edk; Your IP is in ro, rejected b > ased on geographical location (in reply to RCPT TO command)) [...] > Since I saw others doing this, I'd really like a statement from portmgr > (BCC'ed) that commiters and maintainers are not allowed to reject mail > like this. I, for one, would commit via instant maintainer timeout to > ports belonging this type of maintainers. Yeah, you can assume timeout has triggered if you get such a bounce - if you cannot inform a maintainer obviously he will not reply in 14 days... --=20 Vasil Dimov gro.DSBeerF@dv % A: Yes. | Q: Are you sure? | | A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. | | | Q: Why is top posting frowned upon? --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQFFk8PgFw6SP/bBpCARAjOoAKCwIk8RAhg9NfhCO804vwURFXBpAwCg41gq OJoRs2OqHWgSv21xmYLKJpg= =JA53 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --C7zPtVaVf+AK4Oqc--