From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 14 16:06:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 292FE106566C for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:06:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenity@exscape.org) Received: from ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15EC8FC19 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:06:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serenity@exscape.org) Received: from c83-253-252-234.bredband.comhem.se ([83.253.252.234]:57875 helo=mx.exscape.org) by ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MFsE4-0002II-6C; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:06:34 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.5] (macbookpro [192.168.1.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.exscape.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3D72699EF; Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:06:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <7CE0A11C-217A-41D9-8A99-179A5BB838E7@exscape.org> From: Thomas Backman To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= In-Reply-To: <20090614172116.C55547@ramstind.fig.ol.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 18:05:59 +0200 References: <4A2E84DC.1010900@unsane.co.uk> <20090614172116.C55547@ramstind.fig.ol.no> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.935.3) X-Originating-IP: 83.253.252.234 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1MFsE4-0002II-6C. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp01.sth.basefarm.net 1MFsE4-0002II-6C e6a06719fa3728ad15866b5aaf3638a7 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, FreeBSD current Subject: Re: sysinstall, GJOURNAL and ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 16:06:38 -0000 On Jun 14, 2009, at 05:44 PM, Trond Endrest=F8l wrote: > > Although longer to type, "less /README" would be a better alternative > than using vi to view the contents of the file. You could otherwise > risk the user destroying the README file due to unfamiliarity with > this particular editor. I'd say the bigger risk is that the user goes "what the heck is =20 this?!" and gives up, not even managing to quit vi. ;) (Been there, done that! I'm an avid vim user now, but sure wasn't five =20= years ago.) Regards, Thomas=