From owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org  Sun Jul 24 14:32:28 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13A69BA39C5
 for <freebsd-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 24 Jul 2016 14:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 031631558
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 14:32:28 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u6OEWRGc047393
 for <freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 24 Jul 2016 14:32:27 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 211333] Inconsistent exposure of unlinkat and AT_REMOVEDIR
Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 14:32:28 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: bin
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-RELEASE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: jilles@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jilles@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution assigned_to
Message-ID: <bug-211333-8-8nATa4ZSiH@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-211333-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-211333-8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2016 14:32:28 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D211333

Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|New                         |Closed
                 CC|                            |jilles@FreeBSD.org
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
           Assignee|freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org    |jilles@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #1 from Jilles Tjoelker <jilles@FreeBSD.org> ---
Applications are not supposed to define __BSD_VISIBLE and whenever
<sys/cdefs.h> sets __BSD_VISIBLE to non-zero, it also sets __POSIX_VISIBLE =
and
__XSI_VISIBLE to the newest version supported. Therefore, the correct fix i=
s to
remove the || __BSD_VISIBLE part in that line in include/unistd.h. I did th=
is
in 11-current in SVN r265878 but do not plan to MFC it.

Note that it is still possible to have __POSIX_VISIBLE or __XSI_VISIBLE in =
the
same #if as __BSD_VISIBLE if the feature was deprecated by POSIX and is
therefore only available in older POSIX versions but should still be availa=
ble
in the default compilation environment.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=