From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 6 12:21:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED36D106566B for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:21:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rmacklem@uoguelph.ca) Received: from esa-annu.mail.uoguelph.ca (esa-annu.mail.uoguelph.ca [131.104.91.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD498FC13 for ; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 12:21:03 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApwEALbe1EyDaFvO/2dsb2JhbACDMZ9IqyCQYIEigzNzBIpV X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.58,307,1286164800"; d="scan'208";a="98005232" Received: from erie.cs.uoguelph.ca (HELO zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca) ([131.104.91.206]) by esa-annu-pri.mail.uoguelph.ca with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2010 07:52:28 -0400 Received: from zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by zcs3.mail.uoguelph.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AC1B3F54; Sat, 6 Nov 2010 07:52:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 6 Nov 2010 07:52:28 -0400 (EDT) From: Rick Macklem To: =?utf-8?Q?Ulrich_Sp=C3=B6rlein?= Message-ID: <577449795.190094.1289044348243.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> In-Reply-To: <20101106093700.GW85693@acme.spoerlein.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [99.225.56.115] X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.7_GA_2476.RHEL4 (ZimbraWebClient - IE8 (Win)/6.0.7_GA_2473.RHEL4_64) Cc: Pyun YongHyeon , stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Abysmal re(4) performance under 8.1-STABLE (mid-August) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:21:04 -0000 > Hello Pyun, > > On this new server, I cannot get more than ~280kByte/s up/downstream > I have been working on a similar problem with Pyun's help. Not yet resolved and no idea if it is the same problem, but see below... > > Any ideas? I have been chasing a similar problem w.r.t. re(4) { slow NFS reads on -current }. You could try building a kernel with "options DEVICE_POLLING" and see if that helps. If that makes it work faster, then it might be the same issue. rick