From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 25 10:02:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701FA106564A for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 10:02:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yann.kempf@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f176.google.com (mail-px0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454818FC13 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 10:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi11 with SMTP id 11so5744912pxi.7 for ; Wed, 25 May 2011 03:02:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:cc:content-type; bh=6BzkCz6rCX7JhsButUHfwbgDj8HYMQCb5tD/IM7HaGE=; b=VB8f/M+GijsrOq+h1POIcqYwdzTFlC3BFOuOZzlwMAsJK+nDfN6WA/Bj1rYYnZVSkc Gvw6Js+SHhK2UUesJ/U1tkR877M1sz/Ic5bIeNXMq9b+jQCiG8CEl/tqm9nvIvaKOYvr K3LsLP2cHxDs2FyA8BAVxZEXalLAKVl+pNq9Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:cc :content-type; b=h6Bs3VdktsP2KCGXDjN4lqSS/SrTYVFa7/1MbaxRcxGd02jCiStTm3g/la+UaNltvm 10Ac4Qpgam7WTKq0zkOJ2+UmH2gAiB/yR2R3w1XUGMT6032QoiSSA1RXpDt4LNysvBGj pRTGkPkzyV4mS1bv25OeZ+r0x8l5HoMQGnjco= Received: by 10.142.253.20 with SMTP id a20mr1614392wfi.190.1306316433434; Wed, 25 May 2011 02:40:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.90.9 with HTTP; Wed, 25 May 2011 02:40:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DDC107E.6080703@barafranca.com> References: <1306253763.3340.9.camel@hitfishpass-lx.corp.yahoo.com> <4DDC107E.6080703@barafranca.com> From: Yann KEMPF Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 11:40:03 +0200 Message-ID: Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org\"" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Some success, some questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 10:02:51 -0000 It's due to a NetBSD issue. NetBSD doesn't support multiple CPU and Xen simultaneously. On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 22:09, Hugo Silva wrote: > On 05/24/11 17:16, Sean Bruno wrote: > > I've made some significant progress on the freebsd.org xen hosting > > machines (no dom0 support yet, but I'm working on it). > > > > I've installed a netbsd-current dom0 and the 3.3.2 xen hypervisor on > > xen1.freebsd.org and started up a freebsd-current DomU with the XENHVM > > kernel installed. I've attached the dmesg and the xen config for > > "xen2.freebsd.org" to this message. > > > > NetBSD now has Xen 4.1 too. Recently committed patches have enabled HVM > guests to properly detect phy: storage. See recent port-xen (netbsd) for > more information. > > If you're on NetBSD -current and not using LVM, keep in mind that's an > option too -- even though presently, renaming/destroying lvs doesn't > work (bin/44947). > > > I've been crashing the hypervisor pretty reliably by setting the DomU to > > use multiple CPUs. Not sure if this is a Xen or NetBSD thing, but for > > now i'm leaving vcpus set to 1. > > > > > 1. How do I switch the networking vif entry to use the netfront xn0 > > driver instead of emulating a e1000? > > If using XENHVM, you should see a xn0 interface on ifconfig output. Just > setup networking there instead. > > By coincidence you're also using NetBSD as the dom0, please let us know > if you hit the same problem I did (see my recent post on this list). > > Regards, > > Hugo > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >