From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 9 17:55:07 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C602916A419 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8130213C4D1 for ; Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:55:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-fs@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1JNtuo-0000Mv-IP for freebsd-fs@freebsd.org; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:55:02 +0000 Received: from www.creo.hu ([217.113.62.14]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:55:02 +0000 Received: from csaba-ml by www.creo.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:55:02 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org From: Csaba Henk Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 17:51:36 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 13 Message-ID: References: <3bbf2fe10802061700p253e68b8s704deb3e5e4ad086@mail.gmail.com> <1202395350.2126.14.camel@localhost> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: www.creo.hu User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Sender: news Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Remove NTFS kernel support X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2008 17:55:07 -0000 On 2008-02-07, martinko wrote: >> If the base NTFS support was axed, would the fuse-kmod, or equivalent, >> find its way into the base? It's now not far from the point where it could be included. > And what about puffs from NetBSD ? > Wouldn't it be better to import puffs and ReFUSE ? A PUFFS port probably would need more work than sort out the not too several issues with fuse4bsd. Csaba