From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 31 10:40:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8D016A4CE for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:40:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao07.cox.net (lakemtao07.cox.net [68.1.17.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12DE743D31 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 10:40:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040331184055.CLLX10539.lakemtao07.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 13:40:55 -0500 Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 12:41:24 -0600 To: John Merryweather Cooper References: <200403310656.i2V6uS7p029577@ns1.mezzweb.com> <1080731748.648.12.camel@localhost> <1080755917.669.11.camel@localhost> From: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1080755917.669.11.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518 cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Update port: www/screem 0.8.2 -> 0.10.1, repo copy www -> editors and some clean up X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 18:40:55 -0000 On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 09:58:39 -0800, John Merryweather Cooper wrote: > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 09:45, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Wed, 31 Mar 2004 03:15:50 -0800, John Merryweather Cooper >> wrote: >> >> > A number of points: >> > >> > 1) the update is good as 0.10.1 has just been released and is the >> stable >> > version; >> > >> > 2) the repo copy should be denied unless all of the HTML editors (such >> > as bluefish) are going to be moved from www/ to editors/; >> >> This is next, I am planning to submit about move bluefish to editors. > > This is a bad idea. What about all the other non-broswer utilities in > www/? For that matter, on a purists note one could re-align most of the > ports tree into editors on the grounds that the program was really an > editor modifying a file. Add like 'editors gnome www' should be good as long editors is main. > I think the original intention was that editors would refer to compiler > language editors and text editors, and that other editors would go > elsewhere. Editors is an editor, nothing more and nothing less. As you said, 'text editors' and this HTML editor is a text editor too. :-) Cheers, Mezz -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.