From owner-freebsd-current Sun Aug 2 20:53:15 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA20040 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 20:53:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id UAA20030 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 20:53:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@village.org) Received: from pencil-box.village.org [10.0.0.22] by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1) id 0z3BgE-0005st-00; Sun, 2 Aug 1998 21:53:02 -0600 Received: from pencil-box.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pencil-box.village.org (8.8.8/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA06153; Sat, 1 Aug 1998 23:49:45 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199808020549.XAA06153@pencil-box.village.org> To: Stefan Eggers Subject: Re: State of current... Cc: Henry Vogt , current@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 20 Jul 1998 12:10:47 +0200." <199807201010.MAA07091@semyam.dinoco.de> References: <199807201010.MAA07091@semyam.dinoco.de> Date: Sat, 01 Aug 1998 23:49:45 -0600 From: "M. Warner Losh" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <199807201010.MAA07091@semyam.dinoco.de> Stefan Eggers writes: : > So this appears to me like a new introduced bug in the shared memory handling : ? : > (Or am I wrong that the difference between :0.0 and :0.0 is the way : > IPC between X-Server and -Client ist handled ?) : : As far as I know :0.0 uses a Unix domain socket under /tmp while the : latter form uses TCP/IP. :0.0 is defined to use the best transport possible for the local machine, which in the case of all X servers for FreeBSD uses the unix domain socket. hostname:0.0 uses tcp/ip transport. shared memory is used only for pixmaps in the freebsd x server. Warner P.S. This is for both x inside (errr xig) and xfree86 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message