From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 14:30:13 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DAF91065670 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@my.gd) Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com (mail-wi0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0005F8FC15 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wibhr1 with SMTP id hr1so5388434wib.13 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:30:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.106.165 with SMTP id gv5mr34868834wib.18.1326205811765; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:30:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from dfleuriot-at-hi-media.com ([83.167.62.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hv1sm1569066wib.1.2012.01.10.06.30.10 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:30:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4F0C4B71.8060606@my.gd> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 15:30:09 +0100 From: Damien Fleuriot User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4F0C0EBC.3010401@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <4F0C0EBC.3010401@nagual.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:30:13 -0000 On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef: >> On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote: >>> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports? >> The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the >> precompiled package you got used. While many people want PHP in the >> form of an Apache module, other folks use it via fastcgi and so forth... > Yes that might be so. But it's far better to *have* this module and > disable it in Apache than not have it at all and for that reason only > *buiild* apache from ports in stead of using a package. > Yeah, no thank you. What about those people that don't even *use* apache and want to install PHP ? We get stuck with a useless module ? Really, *no thank you*