From owner-freebsd-arch Thu Jan 17 1:54:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12ADC37B400 for ; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 01:54:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16R9Ho-0005qu-00; Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:56:44 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" Cc: arch@freebsd.org, jasone@canonware.com Subject: Re: termcap versus terminfo In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 17 Jan 2002 01:44:39 PST." <001501c19f3b$94c35280$1401a8c0@tedm.placo.com> Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 11:56:44 +0200 Message-ID: <22499.1011261404@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 17 Jan 2002 01:44:39 PST, "Ted Mittelstaedt" wrote: > The current FreeBSD scheme with the compiled termcap.db > has terrible documentation. In fact the only mention of the > need to use cap_mkdb to build termcap.db is in the cap_mkdb > man page, and it's not even a mention, it's just a link in > SEE ALSO. It's not mentioned in the man page for termcap. Are there any objections to rebuilding termcap.db once a day from the periodic scripts? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message