From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 28 20:03:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CCE416A4DD; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5117743D4C; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:03:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (wm.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C9D291B01; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:03:39 -0300 (ADT) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (mx1.hub.org [200.46.204.128]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77754-02; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:03:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1046) id D609A291B06; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:03:38 -0300 (ADT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC50E291B01; Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:03:38 -0300 (ADT) Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 17:03:38 -0300 (ADT) From: "Marc G. Fournier" X-X-Sender: freebsd@hub.org To: Garance A Drosehn In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060828170232.Q82634@hub.org> References: <20060825233420.V82634@hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BSDStats - What is involved ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 20:03:50 -0000 On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Garance A Drosehn wrote: > At 11:36 PM -0300 8/25/06, Marc G. Fournier wrote: >> In getting this into the base system itself? Opt-in, >> default turned off, of course, but maybe as an option >> in sysinstall to be enabled easily? > > I think it should be like perl or X11. Have it available > on the first installation CD, and easily selectable, but > not in the freebsd base system. I think it would be best > for it to remain a separate port. That works too ... all I'm looking for is high enough visibility that ppl know its there ... this is something meant to benefit us all in the long term, but the faster / easier it can be deployed, the sooner useful numbers will be generated ...