From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 10 17:07:15 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 2911416A4CF; Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:07:15 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:07:15 +0000 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20050310170715.GD34206@hub.freebsd.org> References: <200503091838.06322.mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> <20050310004919.GA34206@hub.freebsd.org> <87ll8vn32j.fsf@neva.vlink.ru> <20050310160852.GB1718@mail.crypta.net> <20050310123852.F92893@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050310123852.F92893@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org cc: Denis Shaposhnikov cc: Andy Hilker Subject: Re: the current status of nullfs, unionfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:07:15 -0000 On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:45:04PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Andy Hilker wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >You (Denis Shaposhnikov) wrote: > >>>>>>>"Kris" == Kris Kennaway writes: > >> > >> Kris> nullfs seems to work fine, unionfs is very fragile and easily > >> Kris> exploded. > >> > >>nullfs is absolutely useless for jail's because TOO slow. > > > > > >What do you mean exactly, how do you benchmark this? > > That's okay, my experiences are that nullfs is too fragile and easily > exploded ... I was referring to 5.x and above. Kris