From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Jun 3 08:51:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3DEB65733 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from uk1mail2513.mymailbank.co.uk (UK1MAIL2513-PERMANET.IE.mymailbank.co.uk [217.69.47.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF971ED8 for ; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 08:51:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from steve@sohara.org) Received: from smtp.lan.sohara.org (UnknownHost [88.151.27.41]) by uk1mail2513-d.mymailbank.co.uk with SMTP; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:50:59 +0100 Received: from [192.168.63.1] (helo=steve.lan.sohara.org) by smtp.lan.sohara.org with smtp (Exim 4.86_2 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1b8kp6-000N5Q-Fn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Jun 2016 08:51:20 +0000 Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:51:14 +0100 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rsync or git backups? Message-Id: <20160603095114.403943a7ec82c83472130af1@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) X-Clacks-Overhead: "GNU Terry Pratchett" Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 08:51:38 -0000 On Fri, 3 Jun 2016 09:19:09 +0200 Luca Ferrari wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:49 PM, jungle Boogie > wrote: > > On 1 June 2016 at 01:35, Luca Ferrari wrote: > >> > >> Any suggestion? > > > > > > Obviously the first choice is zfs snapshots but if you're like me, > > that's not a choice. > > > > I'd recommend something like borg backup: > > https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/ > > http://borgbackup.readthedocs.io/en/stable/ > > Thanks to all. > Effectively ZFS is a kind of too much for my poor USB disks, also > because I would like to have them a little more portable than ZFS will > give me (I'm not aware of any commercial media center able to read > from a ZFS storage). > I will give a try to rsnapshot and borg. One thought for you - perhaps keep the master copy under ZFS for snapshots and corruption protection and use rsnapshot or borg to copy to more portable copies for use. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith