From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 12 11:00:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FAC1065671 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:00:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.152]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE1F8FC12 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:00:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanefbsd@gmail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id l26so2909395fgb.35 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:00:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=4ZbqBfGJ3wEgX3tcHNBYRoqu98UI118seLQe2AAaaGU=; b=AuGzsaSBD3tLGis1BgobcV2e4gza1Auz5anK3K/YjhPhVcSIbI5mBel1TZE/FycHc/ 6ofZVDhpZjx4lQptmIFhWEB4C4W9XyATXqhrgoU3WPOKvighUWrMud8BzS6BbcJLAZQJ wDoBFdUJrI9Zez8dsedpsdQDgdsg4Met0yQTk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=PcYeAfMUoiwm1A1tTWAKIamuZj62vufYgJkXzeL3BCDa3XMzdhYKiUlJf/XDxCNsz/ Fp8Kpu7/+ALue+7CxTn5JBk2WsLmt7MMlGew0Ma2uQ1vaSYLW058jeEgj7g4p/+1B7yV IlX+OfPTkyCKqWLloKQBaChLEYKzm1GfWQaT0= Received: by 10.86.33.19 with SMTP id g19mr2024927fgg.4.1213268404540; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 04:00:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.86.26.8 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:59:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <7d6fde3d0806120359g50e068e7q54e95da95e97932c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:59:59 -0700 From: "Garrett Cooper" To: "Harti Brandt" , current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080611174933.C66190@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <7d6fde3d0806091102k62637099qbaa73ca4d38ff64c@mail.gmail.com> <484DB796.4030204@mawer.org> <20080611022502.3d6c01d5.stas@FreeBSD.org> <484F5726.9050300@mawer.org> <484F6999.4080001@mawer.org> <20080611163433.H40102@fledge.watson.org> <20080611174933.C66190@beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Cc: Subject: Re: Moving from smbfs to cifs X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:00:06 -0000 On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Robert Watson wrote: > > RW> > RW>On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Antony Mawer wrote: > RW> > RW>> > I stumbled across patches available by R. Imura which are a work todays > RW>> > adding Unicode support to smbfs, and from what I gather are derived from > RW>> > changes in Darwin (Mac OS X) smbfs: > RW>> > > RW>> > http://people.freebsd.org/~imura/kiconv/ > RW>> > > RW>> > > RW>> > There are potentially other improvements available from the Darwin SMBFS > RW>> > implementation, available here: > RW>> > > RW>> > http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/10.5.2/ > RW>> > http://www.opensource.apple.com/darwinsource/tarballs/other/smb-348.1.tar.gz > RW>> > RW>> Probably another reference worth looking at: > RW>> > RW>> http://opensolaris.org/os/project/smbfs/ > RW> > RW>Oh, interesting -- I didn't realize that OpenSolaris had picked up our smbfs > RW>implementation also. I spent some time about six months ago comparing the > RW>FreeBSD and FreeBSD-derived Mac OS X implementations of smbfs, and the > RW>differences were almost all syntactic. In particular, their mbuf interfaces > RW>have all been renamed as part of the KPI work; they have also added some > RW>crypto/kerberos parts that we don't have. It would be interesting to do a > RW>similar comparison of with the OpenSolaris version. > > The Kerberos support would be a big win... I remember that I had a look at > the code, but I have not clue with Kerberos programming so I gave up very > fast :-( > > harti > I'll look at the darwin code when I get back sometime next week, and then see what the Solaris code would require. I just want to get the buggy smbfs out of the kernel so we don't have something that's a security risk / non-MPSAFE. -Garrett