From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 12 14: 6:23 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hyperhost.net (hyperhost.net [207.159.132.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89ABD37BA93 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 14:06:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from patseal@hyperhost.net) Received: from foobar.foobar.eyep.net (postfix@p14.a8.du.radix.net [207.192.132.142]) by hyperhost.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA10961; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:06:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: by foobar.foobar.eyep.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 112B6137FC0; Fri, 12 May 2000 17:03:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 17:03:55 -0400 From: Patrick Seal To: "Chad R. Larson" Cc: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca, sheldonh@uunet.co.za, swb@grasslake.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ucd-snmp Message-ID: <20000512170354.A31801@hyperhost.net> References: <20000512145802.A30623@hyperhost.net> <200005122044.NAA29299@freeway.dcfinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <200005122044.NAA29299@freeway.dcfinc.com>; from chad@DCFinc.com on Fri, May 12, 2000 at 01:44:57PM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD foobar.foobar.eyep.net 4.0-STABLE FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE Organization: Hyperhost Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 01:44:57PM -0700i, Chad R. Larson wrote: > I think they're pointing out the difference between "pkg_delete", a > binary part of the system, and "pkg_remove", a perl script in ports. Whoops! Anyway, looking at the source code, what's so great about it? Why should anyone use it? -- ------------------------------------ _____________________________________ Patrick Seal |"Microsoft isn't evil, they just make | really crappy operating systems." Hyperhost - http://www.hyperhost.net| -Linus Torvalds To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message