From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Oct 8 05:04:59 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA19261 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 05:04:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cons.org (knight.cons.org [194.233.237.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA19254 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 05:04:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cracauer@cons.org) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by cons.org (8.8.8/8.7.3) id OAA03434 for ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 14:04:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19981008140448.A3357@cons.org> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 14:04:48 +0200 From: Martin Cracauer To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Current ports tools prevent libfoo.so.x.y? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Did anyone mess with the ports tools to prevent us from storing shared libs with two-level version numbers? I'm doing a port that installs a Linux shared lib with three symlinks. plist is: lib/libMesaGL.so.2.6 lib/libMesaGL.so.2 lib/libMesaGL.so lib/libGL.so On -current with bsd.port.mk from today and pkg-tools a few days old, the .6 at the end of the first keeps getting deleted, both in /var/db/pkg/...CONTENTS and in the package tarfile, makeing packaging incorrect. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536 Paper: (private) Waldstrasse 200, 22846 Norderstedt, Germany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message