From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May 19 07:38:11 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 066D5106566C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 May 2011 07:38:11 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from inyaoo@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.215.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2568FC1A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 May 2011 07:38:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by eyg7 with SMTP id 7so1006474eyg.13
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 19 May 2011 00:38:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:message-id
	:user-agent:mime-version:content-type;
	bh=KhZvhpwLSI0e+LA0J8fgUMeeOxnlCUp/FfHQFsVKxfE=;
	b=hPKnwxs3LOlSk8TiBQARr0lm7ssspfOSBxzc+VA8fMU3i2T4UiPOKKYI/bcIlTQvC3
	I7hxCbRFHc86RwpQMq6C/Vv67KgtBWb2Z1zfLicEx8Fey5pIzo1op6C9uVA5dIuwunc6
	VYf+nORBzHY65YTFSdh4sbPfEsChigcYjD7VI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:message-id:user-agent
	:mime-version:content-type;
	b=SDXFqtqj8kZQsgp6jj8bKSGWRwrUIupdNULnOsSy1R04XXeZ46Ta5kbGyF2p+pDkWI
	78OcyNhqn/UlpZad+qlZsmOgGcAQ6p7TzS6AlfHjmpRn7oNLDZnCLZMX5F9vUilgi6FT
	++Rv+RIz3JHnDaEsqJ8w38fU76p52xcOfsRbg=
Received: by 10.14.1.71 with SMTP id 47mr977359eec.128.1305789058964;
	Thu, 19 May 2011 00:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (chomsky.torservers.net [77.247.181.162])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y4sm150746eeh.21.2011.05.19.00.10.54
	(version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 19 May 2011 00:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
From: Pan Tsu <inyaoo@gmail.com>
To: Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net>
References: <20110518222045.76d9719d@ukr.net>
Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 11:10:44 +0400
Message-ID: <867h9ngo7f.fsf@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: libdispatch-174 is marked as broken: does not link on 9.X.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 07:38:11 -0000

Ivan Klymenko <fidaj@ukr.net> writes:

> I have the system FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r222032 amd64
>
> Port devel/libdispatch well constructed and works, why he:
> libdispatch-174 is marked as broken: does not link on 9.X. ?
>
> .if ${OSVERSION} >= 900000 && ${ARCH} == "amd64"
> BROKEN=         does not link on 9.X
> .endif

Could it be because 9.x after /head@r218822 contains binutils-2.17 while
per ports/146558 and ports/155157 only binutils-2.15 doesn't exhibit
linking error due to failed PIC check? See my followup in ports/155157
for possible workarounds.

  http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-errorlogs/e.9.20110411061440/libdispatch-174.log