From owner-svn-src-stable-10@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 14 16:07:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03AEA24F; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC85229A5; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6C95B93B; Thu, 14 Aug 2014 12:07:13 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: Peter Wemm Subject: Re: svn commit: r269847 - in stable/10: contrib/apr contrib/apr/docs contrib/apr/encoding contrib/apr/file_io/unix contrib/apr/include contrib/apr/include/arch/unix contrib/apr/include/private contrib/... Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 11:14:37 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <53e9707c.2d6c.2d976b@svn.freebsd.org> <201408121119.32037.jhb@freebsd.org> <5874043.odmAkWF3cI@overcee.wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <5874043.odmAkWF3cI@overcee.wemm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201408141114.37992.jhb@freebsd.org> Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Thu, 14 Aug 2014 12:07:13 -0400 (EDT) Cc: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org, Peter Wemm X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable-10@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for only the 10-stable src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 16:07:15 -0000 On Tuesday, August 12, 2014 4:23:16 pm Peter Wemm wrote: > On Tuesday 12 August 2014 11:19:31 John Baldwin wrote: > > On Monday, August 11, 2014 9:40:12 pm Peter Wemm wrote: > > > Author: peter > > > Date: Tue Aug 12 01:40:11 2014 > > > New Revision: 269847 > > > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/269847 > > > > > > Log: > > > MFC r266728,266731,266735,266736,268135,268960,269833 > > > > > > Update apr 1.4.8 -> 1.5.1 > > > Update apr-util 1.5.2 -> 1.5.3 > > > Update serf 1.3.4 -> 1.3.7 > > > Update svnlite 1.8.8 -> 1.8.10 > > > Deal with svnlite.1 manpage. > > > > Isn't this merge a little quick? 1.8.10 only went into head about 6 hours > > before this commit. The 1.8.8 merge to 10 was also rather quick (less than > > an hour after it was merged to HEAD). If the security issues noted in the > > commit for HEAD are severe enough to warrant an immediate merge, then there > > should probably be an advisory. Otherwise, I think svn updates should > > probably have some bake time in HEAD before going to stable. > > The jumbo-MFC was mostly to gather up the updates that have been baking in > head for a while. 10.1 is coming up soon. > > It just seemed silly to MFC everything except a specific, targeted security fix. > I suspect that for every question I got about including the security update, > I'd have received 5 times as many asking why I hadn't included it. Surely the MFC could have waited 3 days or so though? We generally default to having some sort of bake-in period for MFCs and only bypassing that if there is an urgent need (such as an SA). The code flush for 10.1 is still a week away. -- John Baldwin