From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Aug 26 10:15:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98B637B400 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from heaven.gigo.com (heaven.gigo.com [64.57.102.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 536A043E9C for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:15:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lioux@brturbo.com) Received: from 200-193-224-192-bsace7003.dsl.telebrasilia.net.br (200-193-224-192-bsace7003.dsl.telebrasilia.net.br [200.193.224.192]) by heaven.gigo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4976CBA6D for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 10:15:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 55771 invoked by uid 1001); 26 Aug 2002 16:58:54 -0000 Message-ID: <20020826165854.55770.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 13:58:32 -0300 From: Mario Sergio Fujikawa Ferreira To: Alan Eldridge Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Proper categories (was Re: cvs commit: ports/misc Makefile ports/misc/xmms-pipe Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-plist) References: <200208261018.g7QAIBuJ000657@freefall.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200208261018.g7QAIBuJ000657@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE X-Disclaimer: I hope you find what you are looking for... in life :) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:17:49AM -0700, Alan Eldridge wrote: > alane 2002/08/26 03:18:11 PDT > > Modified files: > misc Makefile > Removed files: > misc/xmms-pipe Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr > pkg-plist > Log: > Moved port to audio/ where all the other xmms-* ports live. Well, I think that the maintainer did not oppose this. However, I seriously oppose this. :) audio is for audio related ports. I read audio related as for audio processing be it coding/decoding/playing... xmms-pipe does no such thing. It is a plugin for xmms that allows users to control xmms through a named pipe. There are several xmms related plugins that lie in graphics. Should we move them to audio? IMO they should not be moved since they're primarily graphics based. xmms-pipe is primarily misc based. Incidently, it is used by an audio based program. This does not make it an audio category program. There is nowhere in the Porters Handbook a line saying that a plugin should override its proper category in favor of the category of the program (xmms in this case) it serves as plugin. Therefore, we should use common sense here. I know that your reasoning is as fair as I think mine is. Why don't we rule this once and for all? While we are here, I think we should move some ports out of audio category: *nap* (napster related) and ag* (audio galaxy related) ports should be in net not audio category. Before someone argues, most of the old nap* ports are actually opennapster related; thus, they transmit anything, not only mp3 files. Therefore, they're more akin to p2p software than audio software. Any thoughts? :) -- Mario S F Ferreira - DF - Brazil - "I guess this is a signature." Computer Science Undergraduate | FreeBSD Committer | CS Developer flames to beloved devnull@someotherworldbeloworabove.org feature, n: a documented bug | bug, n: an undocumented feature To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message