From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 10 16:01:23 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E830A1065673
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl)
Received: from smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net
	[212.54.42.166])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21F58FC0A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:01:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [212.54.42.139] (helo=smtp8.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net)
	by smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dick@nagual.nl>) id 1Rke8Y-0005zz-8u
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:01:22 +0100
Received: from 524944af.cm-4-2b.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([82.73.68.175]
	helo=mail.nagual.nl)
	by smtp8.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <dick@nagual.nl>) id 1Rke8X-0000cK-LX
	for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:01:22 +0100
Received: from [192.168.11.34] (192.168.11.34) by yanta (Axigen)
	with (CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 1B3B0B;
	Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:05:11 +0100
Message-ID: <4F0C60D1.6010604@nagual.nl>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 17:01:21 +0100
From: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:9.0)
	Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
References: <CAJxePNJcTh0QZfr_YOLwN-R1nOrdJETxgMPPm78S35MAsipsug@mail.gmail.com>
	<aef8c5199b6d01d3fc5d21ac120574a7.squirrel@pop.pknet.net>
	<CAJxePN+GKorAeHCh0HRfUqwAOJ-x+_xtPiHk_XDuRAmJWYdgoQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<BC7F244A-3393-4BB6-97A7-F7C32C6FD34F@mac.com>
	<4F0C0EBC.3010401@nagual.nl> <4F0C4B71.8060606@my.gd>
In-Reply-To: <4F0C4B71.8060606@my.gd>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AxigenSpam-Level: 4
X-Ziggo-spambar: +++
X-Ziggo-spamscore: 3.6
X-Ziggo-spamreport: BAYES_50=0.8, CM_META_TB_NOARR=0.5,
	FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.665, HELO_MISC_IP=0.001, KHOP_DYNAMIC=0.657,
	RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.982
X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Status: No
X-Spam-Flag: No
Subject: Re: FreeBSD9 + PHP
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 16:01:24 -0000

Op 10-1-2012 15:30, Damien Fleuriot schreef:
>
> On 1/10/12 11:11 AM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
>> Op 9-1-2012 21:06, Chuck Swiger schreef:
>>> On Jan 9, 2012, at 12:02 PM, alexus wrote:
>>>> there is no way to make it like that? so it has to be build via ports?
>>> The PHP maintainer decides the default options, which is what the
>>> precompiled package you got used.  While many people want PHP in the
>>> form of an Apache module, other folks use it via fastcgi and so forth...
>> Yes that might be so. But it's far better to *have* this module and
>> disable it in Apache than not have it at all and for that reason only
>> *buiild* apache from ports in stead of using a package.
>>
> Yeah, no thank you.
>
> What about those people that don't even *use* apache and want to install
> PHP ?
>
> We get stuck with a useless module ?
>
> Really, *no thank you*
Wow, that really IS bad.. considering the price of drivespace.. No it 
really is much better to *force* everyone who wants to run apache/PHP to 
*build* from source. No pkgadd for those guys..