From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 25 12:27:27 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB15544A; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:27:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BCC8FC0A; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id jf20so719622bkc.13 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:27:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=bvbyoT+QpnpU2euTCPQQnKZo2QZ7Z46Fqy/ocadMljc=; b=Dpwvi6+mcRg8P2r4amY85ASXMqKKOvr8Wg/uOv0zbtElU6CVw/Ugz3iRgJF4EE32Zn Jhl1CW3CcHUdQCqn3liFIdDJF0l68e5YbmAUG5KaDdksAlhGu+BvsGlPsdGFbah9YOFw O4iWawLonB8v0ru8qiafXfJZ85ZnZmM2Lch300qAcIVElUdufId0ld7YMQKHoaqKlOE8 VSHCbTiN6/35EdGNpWr7Bxn8VHs1xb5bL42WF6uz9qY/zclYfl84iC/2bY/9831+pOzy ZexV7t5ZCMcu588DiIwTyqRgH5RnIYTDrniyd+XlMrH5wVZF/RpYPLDiaf091AulM/Ql XNIg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.11.207 with SMTP id u15mr6024284bku.40.1351168045970; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.50.197 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:27:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.50.197 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Oct 2012 05:27:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20121025094758.GL4474@droso.net> References: <20121025071502.GG4474@droso.net> <20121025094758.GL4474@droso.net> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:27:25 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Index not being built again From: Chris Rees To: Erwin Lansing Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Kevin Oberman X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 12:27:27 -0000 On 25 Oct 2012 10:47, "Erwin Lansing" wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 09:09:07AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > > On 25 Oct 2012 08:15, "Erwin Lansing" wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:21:45AM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > After two days of having no ports to update on any systems I built the > > > > index myself and: > > > > ldns-1.6.13_1 < needs updating (port has 1.6.14) > > > > libevent2-2.0.19 < needs updating (port has 2.0.20) > > > > libvdpau-0.5 < needs updating (port has 0.5_1) > > > > lighttpd-1.4.31_4 < needs updating (port has 1.4.31_5) > > > > mosh-1.2.3 < needs updating (port has 1.2.3_1) > > > > openjdk6-b26_1 < needs updating (port has b26_2) > > > > portmaster-3.14_5 < needs updating (port has 3.14_6) > > > > wireshark-1.8.2_1 < needs updating (port has 1.8.3) > > > > xterm-284 < needs updating (port has 284_1) > > > > > > > > Looks like the index build is broken again or I have some problem that > > > > is common to all of my systems. Since the recent issue, I suspect that > > > > it is the former. > > > > > > Yes, INDEX is broken by the following commit: > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/2012-October/006294.html > > > There are duplicate pgtcl ports. > > > > Oh no, I'm really sorry- my first broken INDEX :( > > Welcome to the club :-) > > > > Please feel free to disconnect them for now- I'm not home for a while yet. > > > I've reverted part of you commit to databases/Makefile and > Mk/bsd.databases.mk, but left the new ports in the tree. That should > fix the INDEX build for now, and leave it easy for you to readd. Fantastic, thank you. Chris