From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 1 17:31:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AB41065670 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:31:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from mail.ipt.ru (mail.ipt.ru [194.62.233.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42A78FC30 for ; Tue, 1 Apr 2008 17:31:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from sp34.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.107] helo=bs1.sp34.ru) by mail.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JgkKW-0001xs-Lv; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:31:28 +0400 Received: from bsam by bs1.sp34.ru with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1JgkNM-0000Jm-34; Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:34:24 +0400 To: John E Hein References: <07011489@ipt.ru> <20080321115227.zkcrs6rvc4c8s004@webmail.leidinger.net> <98037310@ipt.ru> <20080322085434.10838040@deskjail> <62336383@ipt.ru> <62213004@bs1.sp34.ru> <18418.26253.180946.712309@gromit.timing.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 21:34:24 +0400 In-Reply-To: <18418.26253.180946.712309@gromit.timing.com> (John E. Hein's message of "Tue\, 1 Apr 2008 10\:45\:01 -0600") Message-ID: <51494351@bs1.sp34.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: add LINUX_OSRELEASE to bsd.linux-rpm.mk X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 17:31:30 -0000 On Tue, 1 Apr 2008 10:45:01 -0600 John E Hein wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote at 20:42 +0400 on Apr 1, 2008: > > Seems that I have change my mind since linux-rpm.mk is too tied to rpm > > format and dealing with it. The file can't be (easily) used with an > > average linux port. I tried to convert to using linux-rpm.mk acroread7 > > port. I got a mess. :-( > > > > Well, what about new bsd.linux-apps.rpm? > Ermm... typo? Change that to 'bsd.linux-apps.mk' and it sounds > good to me ;) Sure, it was a typo. ;-) > I've always disliked specifying the package file format in the linux > .mk file name. The thing is that linux-rpm.mk will stay and a new one should be introduced for other purpose (i.e. to decide when to use different linux infrastructure ports). WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve