From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Oct 8 07:18:12 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA04598 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 07:18:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA04593 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 07:18:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asami@vader.cs.berkeley.edu) Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca32-44.ix.netcom.com [209.109.239.44]) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.7/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA20325; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 07:18:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.8.8/8.6.9) id HAA14615; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 07:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 07:17:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199810081417.HAA14615@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> To: cracauer@cons.org CC: cracauer@cons.org, ports@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: <19981008155956.A3561@cons.org> (message from Martin Cracauer on Thu, 8 Oct 1998 15:59:56 +0200) Subject: Re: Current ports tools prevent libfoo.so.x.y? From: asami@FreeBSD.ORG (Satoshi Asami) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * I can live with installing the lib to the short name. Oh. * I only wonder why emulation/linux_lib can install long-named libs with * no visible hack and thought I was just too stupid. I'm not sure it can. Anyone with an ELF system care to test? Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message