From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Oct 8 07:19:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA04841 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 07:19:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from cons.org (knight.cons.org [194.233.237.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA04835; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 07:19:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cracauer@cons.org) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by cons.org (8.8.8/8.7.3) id QAA03597; Thu, 8 Oct 1998 16:19:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19981008161932.A3592@cons.org> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 16:19:32 +0200 From: Martin Cracauer To: Satoshi Asami , cracauer@cons.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Current ports tools prevent libfoo.so.x.y? References: <19981008155956.A3561@cons.org> <199810081417.HAA14615@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.1i In-Reply-To: <199810081417.HAA14615@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>; from Satoshi Asami on Thu, Oct 08, 1998 at 07:17:54AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In <199810081417.HAA14615@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>, Satoshi Asami wrote: > * I can live with installing the lib to the short name. > > Oh. > > * I only wonder why emulation/linux_lib can install long-named libs with > * no visible hack and thought I was just too stupid. > > I'm not sure it can. Anyone with an ELF system care to test? I'll do when the linux_lib-2.5 update is down the cvsup road to me. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer Tel.: (private) +4940 5221829 Fax.: (private) +4940 5228536 Paper: (private) Waldstrasse 200, 22846 Norderstedt, Germany To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message