From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 6 09:52:19 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D78D9125; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 09:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC4FD1EE3; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 09:52:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B9443BC9; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 04:51:52 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <540AD92E.5030602@marino.st> Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 11:51:42 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: koobs@FreeBSD.org, Carlo Strub , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r367404 - in head/security: . webshag webshag/files References: <201409060746.s867kwJ4038485@svn.freebsd.org> <540AD4A8.4050705@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <540AD4A8.4050705@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: clutton@zoho.com X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 09:52:20 -0000 On 9/6/2014 11:32, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 6/09/2014 5:46 PM, Carlo Strub wrote: >> +LICENSE= GPLv3 > > LICENSE_FILE I know mat's position, but this decree was definitely controversial. Many people don't agree that LICENSE_FILE is needed when the provided license is identical to the one offered in ports Templates directory. And since the licensing framework is still an unsupported and mostly undocumented red-headed stepchild of ports, I don't think I agree with saying this was an error. >> +bin/webshag_cli >> +%%WXGTK%%bin/webshag_gui >> +%%ETCDIR%%.conf > > Does this need a filename? This is probably a wonderful side effect of make makeplist which aggressively creates SUB replacements, often incorrectly. This was probably /etc/${PORTNAME}.conf and it got transformed and submitter didn't check closely enough. I agree, DO NOT TRUST MAKEPLIST FURTHER THAN YOU CAN THROW IT! John