From owner-freebsd-stable Fri May 12 16:21: 9 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freeway.dcfinc.com (cx74889-a.phnx3.az.home.com [24.1.193.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE6DC37BA83 for ; Fri, 12 May 2000 16:21:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chad@freeway.dcfinc.com) Received: (from chad@localhost) by freeway.dcfinc.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA29906; Fri, 12 May 2000 16:20:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from chad) From: "Chad R. Larson" Message-Id: <200005122320.QAA29906@freeway.dcfinc.com> Subject: Re: ucd-snmp In-Reply-To: <20000512170354.A31801@hyperhost.net> from Patrick Seal at "May 12, 0 05:03:55 pm" To: patseal@hyperhost.net (Patrick Seal) Date: Fri, 12 May 2000 16:20:37 -0700 (MST) Cc: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca, sheldonh@uunet.co.za, swb@grasslake.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chad@DCFinc.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I recall, Patrick Seal wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 01:44:57PM -0700i, Chad R. Larson wrote: > > I think they're pointing out the difference between "pkg_delete", a > > binary part of the system, and "pkg_remove", a perl script in ports. > > Whoops! Anyway, looking at the source code, what's so great about it? Why > should anyone use it? I dunno. Perhaps the "ALL" switch? -crl -- Chad R. Larson (CRL15) 602-953-1392 Brother, can you paradigm? chad@dcfinc.com chad@larsons.org larson1@home.net DCF, Inc. - 14623 North 49th Place, Scottsdale, Arizona 85254-2207 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message