From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 18 07:42:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0195E16A569 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:42:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from mrout1.yahoo.com (mrout1.yahoo.com [216.145.54.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E2643CA2 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:42:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnn@neville-neil.com) Received: from minion.local.neville-neil.com (proxy7.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.48.98]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/y.out) with ESMTP id kBI7W6SH052120; Sun, 17 Dec 2006 23:32:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:53:57 +0900 Message-ID: From: gnn@freebsd.org To: Randall Stewart In-Reply-To: <45856FE6.6040901@cisco.com> References: <5628d8010612160452y5c562757h8ef8ed0776c5525d@mail.gmail.com> <45856FE6.6040901@cisco.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.8 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Shij=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.90 (i386-apple-darwin8.8.1) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, dave jones Subject: Re: UDP lite for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:42:47 -0000 At Sun, 17 Dec 2006 11:27:18 -0500, randall wrote: > It allows you to do a partial checksum on a udp packet.. the idea > behind it is for when we have link layers that can delivered damaged > packets we can then feed the packets to media players.. that can > still use the data.. even though damaged.. I believe the there are a > couple of codecs that are of this venue... at one time I even knew a > name or two.. but that was a while ago :-) Ah, OK, makes sense. So, Dave, if you're up for working on it I can review patches against HEAD, as can others. I guess I need to add yet another RFC to my incredibly long reading list. Later, George