From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 27 20:02:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF626106566B for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:02:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@FreeBSD.org) Received: from p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.139.233.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C15F8FC14 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (cde1100.uni.vrs [192.168.0.100]) (Authenticated sender: ohauer) by p578be941.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F006320818; Sat, 27 Aug 2011 22:02:46 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4E594D6A.9060407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 22:02:50 +0200 From: Olli Hauer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110812 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: giffunip@tutopia.com References: <1314473398.47547.YahooMailClassic@web113509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1314473398.47547.YahooMailClassic@web113509.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Eitan Adler , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How about finally replacing GNATS? (was Re: FreeBSD problems and preliminary ways to solve) X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ohauer@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2011 20:02:51 -0000 On 2011-08-27 21:29, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > Hi; > > --- On Sat, 8/27/11, Eitan Adler wrote: > > ... > > I agree it's difficult to determine exactly which tool to > use. > >> >> With every tool change comes a workflow change and we need >> to be able to deal with that. As a member of the bugbusting >> team one of the most useful features for me has been the >> ability to use shell scripts to change bug states. As a >> port maintainer one of the most useful features has been >> the ability to use send-pr from the command line >> _without registration_. I'm working with both gnats (on FreeBSD) and bugzilla / Jira on work. Both systems have the advantages / disadvantages. Bugzilla with A good customized UI, a well designed workflow will be an improvement for users, devs, port committers/maintainers. I don't know how many devs / port committers are working with a csup'd gnats database but this and the command line usage is a real advantage for me. [ snipp ... ]