From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep  7 13:12:14 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A0F1065672
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Sep 2011 13:12:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from tzhuan@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-vx0-f182.google.com (mail-vx0-f182.google.com
	[209.85.220.182])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF2F8FC0A
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Wed,  7 Sep 2011 13:12:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by vxh11 with SMTP id 11so928380vxh.13
	for <multiple recipients>; Wed, 07 Sep 2011 06:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
	:cc:content-type;
	bh=XnxaLT9eiyo1JXjWhQjh9dR/gtqx2piaeEm8rbJ5XAM=;
	b=xWr4dFHR/33cb25DmdcxNBqx0gSFAIqG7GrduzmEI24Icc/aXdSFdsFy4HIg+mMS5j
	nhqYgp19iKG99YGEcAzdCXANX7px6oCILQ0B1+5ptUOJD7+S+7ylzZsXVKKCT8sytwfu
	Tt/7N6EIH2aSAtBvTwhBQFubTka3PGGDDhk2o=
Received: by 10.52.178.137 with SMTP id cy9mr6410750vdc.340.1315401133110;
	Wed, 07 Sep 2011 06:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.52.161.234 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Sep 2011 06:11:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAgh0_bOYfpxVu9xYX4ZoYtNajBtLH=Od8700dcg9jahVxshZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CANSeK7wEK33PPTM4Qk3LXoHF+1MebyCGeZgCWodeqetx-mP+iA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1315390225.3285.5.camel@esl.kevlo.org.kevlo.org>
	<CAAgh0_bOYfpxVu9xYX4ZoYtNajBtLH=Od8700dcg9jahVxshZQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tz-Huan Huang <tzhuan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:11:53 +0800
Message-ID: <CANSeK7y1DGjWMDJPBYCjPuMfUhu_ALvbAeLT9hR1eBzs8tk3+A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Kevin Lo <kevlo@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: "Intel Centrino Advanced-N + WiMAX 6250" doesn't work
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 13:12:14 -0000

On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 20:34, Bernhard Schmidt <bschmidt@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:10, Kevin Lo <kevlo@freebsd.org> wrote:
>>
>> Please try attached patch. It seems like OpenBSD added support
>> for 6205, but I'm not sure if it works for 6250.

Okay, I am re-building the kernel now,
will report here if any news.

> Worth a try, but I don't think it will make a difference. I had that
> code once (it should even be visible on the svn history) but removed
> it because it isn't required, the 6005 series devices work very well
> without it (I'm using a 6230 (6000g2b) daily) without issues. What is
> import though is which calibration results are sent to the runtime
> firmware, I suspect there might be an issue in
> iwn5000_rx_calib_results() around IWN5000_PHY_CALIB_DC.
>
> I remember that someone reported the 6250 devices working once, it
> might be worth going over the last revisions (there where some
> calibration related changes) and figure out which one broke it.

Yes, this device works fine according to this post:
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=19839

I have scanned the source but it seems that the iwn sources changed a lot...

Thanks,
Tz-Huan