From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun May 21 12:36:18 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B2FDB37B7E4; Sun, 21 May 2000 12:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Received: from localhost (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA02992;
	Sun, 21 May 2000 12:38:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>
Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>,
	Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>,
	Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG,
	ps@FreeBSD.ORG, Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca
Subject: Re: 4.0_STABLE Broken (was Re: FTP proxy without translation no longer working? (fwd)) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 21 May 2000 15:33:58 EDT."
             <20000521153358.R86725@jade.chc-chimes.com> 
Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 12:38:23 -0700
Message-ID: <2989.958937903@localhost>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Should this be the policy when we find a bug in vinum or pkg_*,
> for example?

If it was just *introduced*, yes.  -stable is not supposed to go
backwards in the stability dept.

> This is an odd mixture of options thats causing the problem,
> not something breaking everyones machine.

All the best bugs are like this.  That doesn't stop them from being bugs.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message