From owner-freebsd-openoffice@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 18 08:05:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F5816A4CE for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:05:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE81F43D5E for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:05:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sander.vesik@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z35so446916rne for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:05:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=t6YgTbx6OcxCkbz5V70iltLPpnwmvG0Y+nABye0B/u2qeWUFSvSF3BrCGPD6wRGTr7mDK2/lDHNg1u77tSS6oOVwyGdqOI7FZkYUnZZmFqEPQIOrSCzLJFjWyqWaynYa7x7OtKpo1SIhvA6dzA18ScmxjGcTI3YWaHKPwRRErf4= Received: by 10.38.78.26 with SMTP id a26mr470846rnb; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:05:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.66.66 with HTTP; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:05:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:05:30 +0200 From: Sander Vesik To: NAKATA Maho In-Reply-To: <20050116.095012.432785286.chat95@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050116.085817.343131517.chat95@mac.com> <20050116.095012.432785286.chat95@mac.com> cc: mikhail@kittown.com cc: openoffice@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why OpenOffice 1.1.4 port does not use WITH_TTF_BYTECODE_ENABLED option ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-openoffice@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sander Vesik List-Id: Porting OpenOffice to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:05:31 -0000 On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 09:50:12 +0900 (JST), NAKATA Maho wrote: > Hi Mikhail, > Can you please take a screenshot? I've never see an improvement > by setting this option or send me a file. > Anything that uses delta hinting to change the actual form of the character would look better (probably a lot) with hinting on as opposed to off. The same goes for non-linear and optical scaling. Sure, some of these things are far more apparent (at least as things stand) if you have bought professional fontsets from foundries - which are sometimes way more expensive even than say MSO ;-) - but still, the benefits do exist and will over time be availale in free fonts aswell. OOo already makes many ftypography related things unnecessarily hard :( > thanks in advance > -- NAKATA, Maho >